Application and selection of RAID in monitoring storage

Release time:2026-07-12 00:00 Views:442 author:Xinlaida Security Technology Department source:technical knowledge
Compare the applicability of RAID 0/1/5/6/10 in monitoring scenarios, explain why RAID5 is commonly used in monitoring projects and the risks of reconstruction.

Common level comparison

LevelAvailable capacityAllow bad disksWrite performanceMonitoring suitability
RAID 0100%0HighestNot recommended, no redundancy
RAID 150%1 (mirror)GeneralOnly small capacity system disk
RAID 5(N-1)/N1BetterCommonly used and cost-effective
RAID 6(N-2)/N2Slightly lowerRecommended when there are many disks or high requirements
RAID 1050%1 block per groupHighHigh performance scenario

Recommendations for monitoring scenarios

  • 4~8 disks: RAID 5. The usable capacity is high and 1 disk failure is allowed.
  • 8 disks or more: RAID 6 is recommended. The more disks there are, the higher the probability that another disk will be damaged during reconstruction.
  • Key recordings: RAID 6 or RAID 1 + offsite backup available.
  • RAID 0 is not recommended: Although the capacity and performance are optimal, if any disk is damaged, all recordings will be lost.

Reconstruction risk (important)

After a disk in the RAID 5 array fails, the system enters a degraded state. At this time:

  • All read requests need to pass verification calculations, and performance drops significantly.
  • The reconstruction process needs to read the data of all remaining disks (for example, 8×8TB needs to read about 56TB), which usually takes 10 to 30 hours.
  • If another disk fails during the rebuilding process, all data will be lost.
  • The URE (Unrecoverable Read Error) probability of large-capacity consumer-grade hard drives makes reconstruction failure not a small probability event.

Practical suggestions

  1. Use surveillance-grade or enterprise-grade hard drives to avoid consumer-grade SMR disks (rebuilding is prone to failure).
  2. Configure Hot Spare to automatically start rebuilding after a disk failure, shortening the downgrade window.
  3. Enable SMART monitoring and alarm and proactively replace it before it is completely damaged.
  4. Make dual-machine backup for important projects or save key channel recordings off-site.
  5. Rehearse the recovery process regularly to verify that the backup is actually available.
  6. When replacing a damaged disk, use a hard disk of the same specification or a larger capacity to avoid mixing disks with different speeds.