The accuracy of intelligent analysis continues to improve, and the false positive rate has become a key indicator for project acceptance

Release time:2026-08-06 00:00 Views:444 author:Xinlaida Security source:Industry trends
The accuracy of intelligent analysis continues to improve, and the false positive rate has become a key indicator for project acceptance
Algorithm iteration and scenario-based optimization have greatly improved the usability of behavior recognition, and the false alarm rate has changed from a major pain point in the past to a quantifiable and acceptable indicator.

Where do false positives come from

  • Small animals, leaves, and changes in light and shadow trigger target detection;
  • The detection area spans roads or entrances and exits, and normal activities are considered abnormal;
  • Low illumination at night results in incomplete target features;
  • Sensitivity is one-size-fits-all, without distinguishing between scenes.

Optimization method

  1. Refined detection area: Avoid roads, trees and reflective surfaces.
  2. Target type filtering: Only alarm targets that match humanoid/vehicle-shaped characteristics.
  3. Dual verification: Video + radar/infrared combination judgment.
  4. Time policy: Distinguish day/night, weekday/holiday rules.
  5. On-site tuning: On-site adjustments for 1–2 weeks after launch.

How to write acceptance criteria

It is recommended to clarify in the project acceptance terms: the upper limit of false alarms in normal scenarios, the detection rate of typical events, The response time from alarm to screen pop-up makes the indicator quantifiable.